U2™ Knee APT

 








● 
Durable, lowered cost, elimination of backside wear, and the ease of removal if necessary. [1,2]
● Multiple articular selections: CR, PS, UC
● Deeper cement recess with rougher surface finishing to enhance cement fixation and anti-rotation
● Featured instrument design ensures safer implantation
● Material: UHMWPE
 
 

 
References

1. [1] All-Polyethylene Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components—An
2. Analysis of 27,733 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacements
3. from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Asgeir Gudnason,
4. Nils P. Hailer, Annette W-Dahl, Martin Sundberg, Otto Robertsson.,
5. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014
6. [2] The role of the cemented all-polyethylene tibial component in
7. total knee replacement: a 30-year patient follow-up and review of
8. the literature. Thomas J. Blumenfeld, Richard D. Scott., Knee. 2010
Brochure